State Health Insurance Exchange Update - February 2013

New Call to action

SUBSCRIBE

The Zane Employee Health Benefits blog covers all of employee health benefits - Defined Contribution, private exchanges, individual health insurance, small business health benefits, HRA, and premium reimbursements. Join thousands of others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Search

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

State Health Insurance Exchange Update - February 2013

 

Starting in 2014, health insurance coverage for individuals and small businesses will become available through new state health insurance exchanges. Most importantly, the key tax credits (e.g. individual health insurance tax subsidies) will only be available for coverage purchased via these exchanges.

February 15, 2013 Deadline 

States were required to decide by February 15, 2013 whether they would:

  1. Create their own health insurance exchanges, 

  2. Partner with the federal government, or 

  3. Default to a federal-run exchange. 

Below is a summary of progress for health insurance exchange implementation as of February 15, 2013:

  • 18 Have Declared a State-based Exchange

  • 7 Have Planned for a Partnership Exchange

  • 26 Have Defaulted to a Federal Exchange

State by State Exchange Update 2013

State by State Guide to Health Insurance Exchanges 2013
State Exchange Decision
Alabama Default to Federal Exchange
Alaska Default to Federal Exchange
Arizona Default to Federal Exchange
Arkansas Planning for Partnership Exchange
California Declared State-based Exchange
Colorado Declared State-based Exchange
Connecticut Declared State-based Exchange
Delaware Planning for Partnership Exchange
District of Columbia Declared State-based Exchange
Florida Default to Federal Exchange
Georgia Default to Federal Exchange
Hawaii Declared State-based Exchange
Idaho Declared State-based Exchange
Illinois Planning for Partnership Exchange
Indiana Default to Federal Exchange
Iowa Planning for Partnership Exchange
Kansas Default to Federal Exchange
Kentucky Declared State-based Exchange
Louisiana Default to Federal Exchange
Maine Default to Federal Exchange
Maryland Declared State-based Exchange
Massachusetts Declared State-based Exchange
Michigan Planning for Partnership Exchange
Minnesota Declared State-based Exchange
Mississippi Default to Federal Exchange
Missouri Default to Federal Exchange
Montana Default to Federal Exchange
Nebraska Default to Federal Exchange
Nevada Declared State-based Exchange
New Hampshire Planning for Partnership Exchange
New Jersey Default to Federal Exchange
New Mexico Declared State-based Exchange
New York Declared State-based Exchange
North Carolina Default to Federal Exchange
North Dakota Default to Federal Exchange
Ohio Default to Federal Exchange
Oklahoma Default to Federal Exchange
Oregon Declared State-based Exchange
Pennsylvania Default to Federal Exchange
Rhode Island Declared State-based Exchange
South Carolina Default to Federal Exchange
South Dakota Default to Federal Exchange
Tennessee Default to Federal Exchange
Texas Default to Federal Exchange
Utah Declared State-based Exchange
Vermont Declared State-based Exchange
Virginia Default to Federal Exchange
Washington Declared State-based Exchange
West Virginia Planning for Partnership Exchange
Wisconsin Default to Federal Exchange
Wyoming Default to Federal Exchange

Source: Kff.org, Data as of February 15, 2013

Special Update for Utah

On February 6, 2013, Governor Gary Herbert offered a proposal to federal officials that would allow the state to run the small business, or SHOP, portion of the exchange while the federal government would establish and operate an exchange for individuals. The state is awaiting HHS' response to the proposal.

Note: This should not be taken as legal or tax advice.

subscribetoblogctablue

Comments

Any idea on when Florida plans to convert to a State Insurance Exchange?
Posted @ Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:24 AM by Michael Grace
Just like the PCIP program was put on hold this week, so too will this subsidy program.  
 
1. it's mathmatically impossible for government to give out so much in subsidies 
2. government has no money except for what it first takes from its citizens. 
 
We have GOT to figure out a way to wrestle back control of the country from the economically ignorant.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:34 AM by todd malone
To Michael: 
 
Gov. Scott has flipflopped on his Medicaid stance, allowing for the expansion of this program. I didn't think that was going to happen and it will. Same goes for the state exchange. He said no before, but what does that really mean? Time is running out tho if he wants to put one in play effectively. 
 
My question is will private exchanges be allowed to facilitate the subsidies? I am marketing a private exchange, but if I'm not able to work the subsidies when selling a plan who is going to go to my site? In the state of Florida, and I'm spit ballin', 95% of the people buying individual plans because of the mandate will be entitled to subsidies.  
 
The individual health market as we know it will be gone...given to the federal exchange and the so called Navigators.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:53 PM by Joseph McCormick
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

More Info
Product
Customers
Across the Web
Contact Us
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is general in nature and does not apply to any specific U.S. state except where noted. Health insurance regulations differ in each state. See a licensed agent for detailed information on your state. Zane Benefits, Inc. does not sell health insurance.