Stand-alone HRAs Can Still Reimburse Health Insurance Premiums

New Call to action

SUBSCRIBE

The Zane Employee Health Benefits blog covers all of employee health benefits - Defined Contribution, private exchanges, individual health insurance, small business health benefits, HRA, and premium reimbursements. Join thousands of others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Search

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Stand-alone HRAs Can Still Reimburse Health Insurance Premiums

 

Over the last 2 weeks, we have received several inquiries regarding PHS Act Section 2711 annual limit requirements and how it affects the future of stand-alone Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). This article outlines a special exemption from the 2711 rules for most stand-alone HRAs that reimburse health insurance premiums.

What Is an HRA?standalone hras post 2014 resized 600

Health Reimbursement Arrangements are employer-funded medical expense reimbursement plans that reimburse employees up to a set dollar amount for medical expenses (defined in Code section 213(d)) per year.

The IRS determines the rules and regulations for HRAs. Generally, HRAs must comply with Sections 105 and 106 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

What Expenses Are Eligible For Reimbursement From an HRA?

HRAs can reimburse employees for medical care expenses as defined by IRS Section 213(d), which include amounts paid for:

(A) the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease,
(B) transportation costs to receive medical care described in (A),
(C) qualified long-term care services as defined in section 7702B (c), or
(D) insurance.

What Is Section 2711?

Section 2711 of the PHS Act, as added by the Affordable Care Act, generally prohibits group health plans from imposing lifetime or annual limits on the dollar value of essential health benefits

On June 28th, 2010, the federal government issued the following regulations for Section 2711:

"§ 2590.715-2711

No lifetime or annual limits.

(a) Prohibition—

(1) Lifetime limits. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage, may not establish any lifetime limit on the dollar amount of benefits for any individual.

(2) Annual limits— (i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (b), and (d) of this section, a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage, may not establish any annual limit on the dollar amount of benefits for any individual.

(ii) Exception for health flexible spending arrangements. A health flexible spending arrangement (as defined in section 106(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code) is not subject to the requirement in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.

..."

How Section 2711 Affects Stand-alone HRAs

The vast majority of stand-alone HRAs are not subject to the new health care law's prohibition on annual benefit limits.

Under a special exception (see bold text above), HRAs that meet the requirements for IRC Section 106(c)(2) are not subject to Section 2711's prohibition on annual limits. Here is the actual definition:

"Section 106(c)(2) Flexible spending arrangement - For purposes of this subsection, a flexible spending arrangement is a benefit program which provides employees with coverage under which—

(A) specified incurred expenses may be reimbursed (subject to reimbursement maximums and other reasonable conditions), and

(B) the maximum amount of reimbursement which is reasonably available to a participant for such coverage is less than 500 percent of the value of such coverage."

Under this exception, sometimes referred to as "the five times rule," the HRA will be treated as a section 106(c)(2) flexible spending arrangement, and the Section 2711 prohibition on annual benefit limits does not apply. 

Also, if an HRA is a Section 106(c)(2) flexible spending arrangement, reimbursable medical care expenses may not include expenses for qualified long-term care services.

How To Ensure Your Stand-alone HRA Is Exempted From 2711

To ensure your stand-alone HRA is exempted from the Section 2711 rules, you can take the following steps:

  1. Set a cap on annual rollover so that the maximum amount of available reimbursement is always less than 5 times the annual value of the HRA, and
  2. Modify the HRA plan to exclude qualified long term care premiums as defined in IRC Section 7702B(c).

Why All The Confusion Regarding Stand-alone HRAs?

On January 24th, 2013, the Department of Labor released a new set of FAQs clarifying which HRAs will be considered "integrated" HRAs.

Several special interest groups (tied to the employer-based health insurance industry) have misinterpreted these FAQs to mean HRAs cannot reimburse premiums due to PHS Act Section 2711.

To be clear, PHS Act Section 2711 does not affect an HRA's ability (under Section 105) to reimburse health insurance premiums. 

Note: This should not be taken as legal or tax advice.

subscribetoblogctablue

Comments

getting clearer all the time,thanks for your continuing clarification.
Posted @ Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:39 PM by FKW
Riok.. thanks for posting and keeping everyone updated and what is becoming more confusing everyday.. Bottom-line? 
Eveyone needs to be aware of all of the regulations and Zane Benefits will assist insurance brokers in providing information to their clients.. 
 
Thanks again for all of your hard work.. 
Posted @ Saturday, February 09, 2013 12:40 PM by James Parsley
I obviously was not the only one inquiring on tis topic. Thanks for the article and clarification. Keep up the good work.
Posted @ Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:16 PM by Todd Catlin
Thanks! My call to HHS with this same question was not returned. I was hoping they might update the FAQ to avoid future questions along the same line.
Posted @ Sunday, February 10, 2013 6:53 AM by Bill Huber
Very helpful, thanks!
Posted @ Sunday, February 10, 2013 7:24 PM by Dennis Watkins
Ditto everyone else's gratitude.  
 
Good to know that it will still be possible to offer Americans more freedom and choice by using the defined contribution strategy.
Posted @ Monday, February 11, 2013 8:30 AM by Todd Malone
How does one determine the annual limit/value of the HRA? My situation is a 1 employee C Corp. Premiums through an exchange will likely be $5000 per year. Does one just come up with an arbitrary amount for extra expenses and add that to the $5k and expense, say $10k per year and limit it to a $50k cap rollover?
Posted @ Monday, February 25, 2013 3:00 PM by Terri
Hi Terri, 
 
Most companies set the amount based on a budget. 
 
To avoid the 5 times rule, we recommend a rollover cap of no more than 4 times the annual contribution. 
 
A more detailed update with be posted on our product update blog this week ( <a hre="http://www.zanebenefits.com/product-update-blog/">http://www.zanebenefits.com/product-update-blog
Posted @ Monday, February 25, 2013 4:41 PM by Rick Lindquist
Was just at a webinar where presenter felt that stand-alone HRA/FSA would not be allowable after 2013 due to being subject to DOL Hpiaa portability. She said problem wasn't with IRS it was DOL. Your thoughts?
Posted @ Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:17 PM by Mike
Hi Mike, 
Can you elaborate on your question; which part of the DOL/HIPAA portability was mentioned? This will help us answer your question accurately.
Posted @ Friday, March 29, 2013 5:17 PM by Christina Merhar
Article with SHRM to add to the confusion.. Looks like the private exchanges will be an option. 
 
the link: 
http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/Articles/Pages/HRAs-Exchanges.aspx 
Posted @ Saturday, March 30, 2013 11:05 AM by James Parsley
Christina, I don't know what section of DOL/Hipaa was referenced. So nothing recent has developed with the Affordable Care Act that will render premium reimbursement for individual plans using HRAs as not allowable?
Posted @ Monday, April 01, 2013 12:28 PM by Mike
Hi Mike,  
Correct -- nothing with ACA has said that HRAs cannot reimburse premiums, however some HRA plans will need to be modified in their plan design to be compliant with the new annual limit provisions. We'll continue to post articles to clarify this and address concerns.
Posted @ Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:19 PM by Christina Merhar
Per the regulatory FAQs from DoL, HHS and Treasury it appears that stand alone HRAs will no longer be available come 2014. Is your program somehow running under an FSA arrangement? I just haven't found information anywhere else that these premiums will still be able to be reimbursed through an HRA. Thank you
Posted @ Tuesday, April 16, 2013 6:38 PM by Tammy Shatto-Thomas
Hi Tammy, 
 
I think this post will help: http://www.zanebenefits.com/blog/bid/262620/ 
 
As the post outlines there are 5 types of HRAs that are excluded from annual limits that the DOL FAQ referenced. Yes, one of these types is a "Flexible Spending Arrangement" HRA which then falls under Section 106(c)(2). Most stand-alone HRAs will fall under this exclusion. 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:32 AM by Christina Merhar
If the HRA is going to be considered under the section 106 ruling (FSA) how does that effect the hra. Will the define contribution have to be used up every yr as it is with a fsa. or will the money be treated like a true HRA where the employer get the non spent money back or the employer can role it over to the next yr and so forth.
Posted @ Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:47 PM by kevin xiong
Hi Kevin,  
No, a regular FSA is a Section 125 plan. The 106(c)(2) "FSA HRA" will act like a true HRA in how you described it (options with balance rollover). However, one change is that the maximum amount of reimbursement which is reasonably available to a participant for such coverage is less than 500 percent of the value of such coverage. We've already starting setting up HRAs in this way, with the rollover cap, for compliance with ACA. 
 
This post explains it more: http://www.zanebenefits.com/blog/bid/262620/ (see Section 2 on FSA HRAs)
Posted @ Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:52 PM by Christina Merhar
This is another example of how Zane continues to mislead agents and groups about "ways around" the very clear prohibitions on defined contribution plans. The 106(c)(2) exception is very limited, specifically to long-term care insurance only. To suggest that it could be used for health benefits is a betrayal of the trust that professionals have you in and an embarrassment to anyone who doesn't research it.
Posted @ Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:03 PM by David C Smith
David - What are you talking about? I have researched this and don't understand your comment. 
 
The 106(c)2 exception is a very broad definition.  
 
IRS Notice 2002-45 (see http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-02-45.pdf) very clearly states an HRA can be a 106(c)2 FSA if it does NOT reimburse long term care premiums and caps maximum reimbursement in accordance with the 5 times rule.  
 
Have you read IRS Notice 2002-45 regarding HRAs?
Posted @ Friday, April 26, 2013 2:50 AM by Steve
Steve.. thanks for providing continued clarification on this subject. One issue that still needs to be addressed is how the exchanges treat the questions for individual coverage as it relates to whether or not the employer is contributing to the premiums.. stay tuned... 
In the meantime the Zane concept is a common sense approach and in the long run the more cost effective way for small business to provide health benefits.
Posted @ Friday, April 26, 2013 8:57 AM by james
The FAQ XI published January 24, 2013 which explains the issue of HRAs does not include an exemption for HRAs except for use with retirees. It states that " the fact that benefits under the HRA by itself are limited does not violate PHS Act section 2711 because the combined benefit satisfies the requirements.". It clearly explains that the issue is that the individual must be also enrolled in the associated group health plan, hence "integrated: It also clearly states that an HRA cannot be integrated with individual health coverage. This has nothing to do with definitions of HRA or exemptions from anything. 
 
Rather than be misled by anyone's interpretations, Why not just read for yourself? 
http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca11.html
Posted @ Friday, April 26, 2013 1:33 PM by George Burns
Hi George: 
 
<< It clearly explains that the issue is that the individual must be also enrolled in the associated group health plan, hence "integrated: It also clearly states that an HRA cannot be integrated with individual health coverage. This has nothing to do with definitions of HRA or exemptions from anything.>>  
This is true if it is an integrated HRA. The PHS 2711 is referring to integrated HRAs, but this is only part of the regulations around HRAs and health reform. 
 
See the regulations on the HRA exceptions in this blog post: New Guidance on Integrated Health Reimbursement Arrangements 
 
Does that help? 
Posted @ Monday, April 29, 2013 10:41 AM by Christina Merhar
For an HRA to be an excepted benefit it still needs to meeth the requirements of Treas. Reg. 54.9831-1(c)(3)(v) and an HRA that reimburses over $500 will never be able to meet this definition becuase of (B) below since, by definition, they have no salary reductions.. 
 
(v) Health flexible spending arrangements. Benefits provided under a health flexible spending arrangement (as defined in section 106(c)(2)) are excepted for a class of participants only if they satisfy the following two requirements— 
 
(A) Other group health plan coverage, not limited to excepted benefits, is made available for the year to the class of participants by reason of their employment; and 
 
(B) The arrangement is structured so that the maximum benefit payable to any participant in the class for a year cannot exceed two times the participant's salary reduction election under the arrangement for the year (or, if greater, cannot exceed $500 plus the amount of the participant's salary reduction election). For this purpose, any amount that an employee can elect to receive as taxable income but elects to apply to the health flexible spending arrangement is considered a salary reduction election (regardless of whether the amount is characterized as salary or as a credit under the arrangement). 
Posted @ Thursday, May 09, 2013 11:44 AM by Kenneth Johnson
Hi Kenneth - You are correct. However, noone is arguing that a Section 106(c)2 HRA FSA would qualify as excepted benefits.  
 
Rather, Section 106(c)2 FSAs are exempted from the annual limit requirements explicitly in the 2711 regulation. See http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/2590.715-2711
Posted @ Thursday, May 09, 2013 12:09 PM by Rick Lindquist
I have to amend the last comment. I was thinking of when FSAs/HRAs are not covered by ACA at all (when they are excepted benefits) and not the particular exclusion from annual caps which references only the Code's FSA definition without regard to whether the FSA is also an excepted benefit. Thus, I think the 500% is still out there for annual caps and has not been addressed further in any FAQs that I am aware of.
Posted @ Thursday, May 09, 2013 12:13 PM by Kenneth Johnson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

More Info
Product
Customers
Across the Web
Contact Us
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is general in nature and does not apply to any specific U.S. state except where noted. Health insurance regulations differ in each state. See a licensed agent for detailed information on your state. Zane Benefits, Inc. does not sell health insurance.