Is Your Business Ready for Health Reform in 2014?

New Call to action

SUBSCRIBE

The Zane Employee Health Benefits blog covers all of employee health benefits - Defined Contribution, private exchanges, individual health insurance, small business health benefits, HRA, and premium reimbursements. Join thousands of others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Search

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Is Your Business Ready for Health Reform in 2014?

 

Today, employers are more stressed than ever. Here’s why:

  1. The business environment is uncertain.

  2. Employer-sponsored health insurance costs increase annually.

  3. New fees and penalties take effect next year, and most employers don’t fully understand how this will affect their financials.

It is time for employers to examine the specifics of healthcare reform and start thinking strategically vs. emotionally. Change is hard. However, employers that educate themselves and plan ahead can avoid severe financial impacts.change is hard

Are you ready for health care reform ("ACA") in 2014?

Note: This article assumes "you" are the employer.

Embrace the Challenge of Change

Treat ACA as a catalyst for a positive transformation. It will not be easy. Change is hard. But, if you can embrace the disruption, you will create an opportunity to ensure your company’s long-term financial health as it relates to health insurance.

The more change and disruption your business embraces, the more cost savings (for both the company and its employees) you will be able to realize over the long term.

In order to embrace this change, you must be familiar with the key aspects of ACA. Read on for the basics.

The Healthcare Reform “Guarantee”

The healthcare reform bill guarantees access to health insurance that is both “affordable” and provides “minimum essential" coverage. But, what does that mean?

The “Employer Mandate” Test

Technically, no business is required to provide health insurance under healthcare reform.

However, effective January 1, 2014, employers with 50 or more full-time-equivalent employees may be subject to penalties if the employer:

  1. Does not pass the affordability test,

  2. Does not pass the minimum value test, or

  3. Does not offer health insurance.

The penalties are capped at $2,000 multiplied by the number of full-time employees minus 30.

Note: The penalty amount only takes into account full-time employees. So, if you have 30 or less full-time employees you will not pay a penalty in any of the above circumstances.

Separately, you are only subject to the penalty calculation if you have 50 or more full-time-equivalent employees.

Note: If you have less than 50 total employees (whether part-time or full-time) you will not pay a penalty in any of the above circumstances.

To obtain the number full-time equivalent employees for your business, add the number of your full-time workers to the full-time equivalency of your part-time workers (i.e. the number of part-time hours divided by 120).

Note: A worker will be considered a "full-time employee" if they work a minimum of 30 hours per week.

The "Affordability" Test

Affordability will be based on the Federal Poverty Limit (FPL) and a percentage of wages. For
employee-only coverage, the employee’s contribution may not exceed 9.5% of W-2 income.
As long as a "minimum value" employer-sponsored plan does not require an individual to pay more, you will not be penalized.

The “Minimum Value” Test

Minimum value is generally defined as “covering 60% of total allowed costs”. Starting in 2014, health plans will disclose whether they meet this minimum value requirement.

W-2 Reporting

Healthcare reform requires businesses to report the “aggregate cost of employer-provided group health plan coverage”. Companies that issue fewer than 250 W-2s annually do not have to provide this information. This is for reporting purposes only. The amounts will not be taxed.

The Individual Tax Subsidies

It’s important for you to understand the financial obligations that employees will face under healthcare reform.

Employees will be eligible for a subsidy if their income ranges from 100% to 400% of the FPL. However, if you provide employer-based coverage that passes the affordability test and the minimum value test, your employees will not qualify!

It’s important to note that a family of 4 with the average salary of $55,000 would only pay $370 per month ($4,438 per year) for individual health insurance. That's compared with $15,000+ per year for traditional employer-sponsored coverage.

Click here for more information on the tax subsidies.

The Individual "Mandate"

The ACA includes an “individual responsibility requirement”, commonly known as the individual mandate. First, ACA does not require Americans to buy insurance. However, if they do not, they will be subject to a tax penalty.

In 2014, this penalty will only be $95/individual, $285/family, or 1% of household income (whichever is greater). However, the penalty will increase:

  • in 2015 to $325/individual, $975/family or 2% of household income (whichever is greater), and
  • in 2016 to $695/individual, $2,085/family or 2.5% of household income (whichever is greater).

Beyond 2016, the penalty will be adjusted for inflation.

Click here for more information on the individual mandate.

The Exchanges

The exchanges will be an entirely new health insurance marketplace for individuals and small businesses in America. They’ll provide plans that deliver four levels of benefit (value): Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum. Enrollment is scheduled to open October 31, 2013 and close on December 22, 2013 for the first plan year, scheduled to begin January 1, 2014.

Note: The individual tax subsidies (see above) are ONLY available via the individual health insurance exchange.

Cost-management Strategies and Innovation

You may be tempted to disengage and assume the government will dictate your choices. Resist this urge.

For many businesses, the solution to healthcare reform is simple: Offer a “Business Expense Account” for Healthcare. A new vehicle, called an “HRA”, or health reimbursement arrangement, allows employers to get out of the health insurance business, and simply give select employees monthly allowances to spend on their own health insurance policy in a state health insurance exchange. If you understand how business expense accounts work, you will understand how HRAs work.

Click here for more information on health reimbursement arrangements.

Your 3 Core Options

You should immediately compare the costs and benefits of the following three options:

  1. Offering Traditional Coverage,
  2. Offering an HRA, or
  3. Dropping Coverage Altogether.

Note: Compare costs and benefits at both the employer and individual level. Depending on your workforce, you may find that dropping traditional coverage is a gift to your employees.

Note: This should not be taken as legal or tax advice.

subscribetoblogctablue

Comments

I think a lot of people are missing the fact (as noted in post)that the employer cannot simply lower hours to 29 or below. The calculation takes into account your Part-Time hours divided by 30. Notice the language "Full-Time equivalent".
Posted @ Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:50 PM by Mark Summers
Part-time employees only factor into figuring out if you are subject to the penalty.  
 
Part-time employees do not count towards the actual penalty amount.
Posted @ Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:33 AM by Steve Johnson
Would an HRA serving as a defined contribution health benefit allow an employer with over 50 FTE's to avoid the $2000 penalty if enough money was available in the HRA to pass the affordability test? In other words, if the HRA provided enough money to ensure that the lowest paid employee would not pay more than 9.5% of their income for the purchase of a "bronze"plan through the state exchange, would the employer avoid penalties?
Posted @ Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:13 AM by Joe
As the law is currently written, no.  
 
As the law is currently written, an HRA is not an eligible employer sponsored plan and an individual plan cannot be used to satisfy the employer mandate. 
 
There is talk that regulations may allow this, but it is doubtful.
Posted @ Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:19 AM by Rick Lindquist
Steve you are correct. Thanks for clarifying. I did not intend to mislead anyone. My point is: I hear a lot of misguided advice telling large employers to just lower hours below 30
Posted @ Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:20 AM by Mark Summers
My question may be obvious but we are a small employer as are vast numbers of US firms. Does this post apply only to large employers? If so, then is it true to infer that small employers (fewer than 50 FT EEs)are not really affected by ACA? If so, they would not have to pass the affordability and minimum values tests. It would seem then that small employers can offer a health care plan or not and require whatever employee share of cost they deem appropriate. Employees would then be able to opt out to the Exchanges if the share of cost is too much. Am I inferring correctly?
Posted @ Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:36 AM by Dorothy Turner
Hi Dorothy,  
 
Correct - Small businesses (with less than 50 FTE EEs) are not subject to the "employer" penalty. 
 
However, the owners and their employees are subject to the individual penalties. Also, the owner and each of the employees may be eligible for tax credits on the individual market. 
 
For these reasons, small business owners should 1) understand health reform and 2) Evaluate the three Core options taking into account the different individual and employer tax penalties / credits. 
 
In other words, many businesses may find that it will be better (financially) for the employees and the owner to drop health insurance coverage completely (and let employees go to the state exchange). 
 
Simply put, if a small businesses fails to evaluate all options, they could lose the opportunity for substantial savings (at both the employer and employee level). 
 
Does this make sense?
Posted @ Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:48 PM by Rick Lindquist
Perfectly, Rick, and thank you. I'm sure we will be looking into the savings. By the way, the charts you all supplied in your newsletter were very clear and helpful. Thank you.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:54 PM by Dorothy Turner
Thanks, Dorothy! 
 
If you have any ideas on how we can improve the employer or employee software or benefit experience, please let us know at ideas.zanebenefits.com. 
 
We appreciate any help we can get!
Posted @ Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:57 PM by Rick Lindquist
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

More Info
Product
Customers
Across the Web
Contact Us
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is general in nature and does not apply to any specific U.S. state except where noted. Health insurance regulations differ in each state. See a licensed agent for detailed information on your state. Zane Benefits, Inc. does not sell health insurance.