January, 2011 | Employee Health Benefits and Insurance Blog

New Call to action

SUBSCRIBE

The Zane Employee Health Benefits blog covers all of employee health benefits - Defined Contribution, private exchanges, individual health insurance, small business health benefits, HRA, and premium reimbursements. Join thousands of others and subscribe now!

Subscribe to RSS feed Add us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe by email

Your email:

Search

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Small Group Health Insurance Reform and HRAs

 
Small group hra

In many states there are outdated, unenforceable insurance regulations that imply that the payment of an individual health insurance premium by a small employer (generally defined as a company with 2-50 companies) requires the insurance company to treat the individual health insurance policy as a group health insurance plan.  In other words, if the regulations were enforced, the insurer might be required to issue a similar policy to other employees regardless of each employee's health status and age.  Most of these regulations were adopted as part of an NAIC Model Act "Small Group Reform" (SGR) in the early 1990s.

Large Employers Are Switching to Defined Contribution Health Plans

 
general motors defined contribution health
Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

Many large employers are terminating traditional defined benefit retiree plans in favor of a defined contribution approach utilizing the individual market and Medicare.  

This approach relies on health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), which retirees can use to pay for health care expenses and Medicare Part B and Part D premiums

The following companies (among others) have already decided to make the switch:
Click the above links for details on each company's decision.

New Site Aims to Eliminate Healthcare-Association Infections (HAIs)

 
kimberly clark not on my watch
Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

The Department of Health & Human Services recently released its annual report on the quality of U.S. health care and the problem of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs).

An HAI is an infection that a patient develops during a hospital stay (i.e. the patient did not have the infection before admission to the facility).

Kimberly-Clark Health Care has launched a website, "Not on My Watch", that provides tools and information to help health care professionals and facilities eliminate HAIs.

According to the website, HAIs represent an estimated annual impact of $6.7 billion to healthcare facilities. 

Thought you might be interested in reading about this...  click here to read more.

States Try to Cut Medicaid

 
states cut medicaid
Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

Many states are facing large budget problems due to the poor economic climate.  As a result, many states are pointing to Medicaid cuts as a logical way to balance the budget.

For example, the Washington Post reported that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has signed a bill that would allow her to request a waiver from complying with new federal Medicaid regulations required by the health reform bill. The new federal Medicaid regulations require that states maintain their current levels of coverage until 2014.

According to the article:

"The waiver Brewer is seeking would effectively push out all 250,000 childless adults on Medicaid. An additional 30,000 parents whose incomes are above 50 percent of the poverty line would also lose their coverage... Brewer's staff projects that the move would save $541 million in 2012, then $900 million the following year."

What do you think? Should the federal government approve a waiver like this?

IRS Releases New W-2 Form for 2011

 
w2 form 2011
Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

The IRS has released the 2011 version of Form W-2 that includes the addition of new codes for reporting the cost of employer-sponsored health coverage. 


According to the Instructions, additional reporting guidance (including instructions on how to calculate the "aggregate cost" of coverage) will be available on the IRS Website later this year.
Tags: , , ,

House Votes to Repeal Health Care Reform

 
house repeals health care bill
Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice
 
Today, the House voted 245 to 189 to repeal the health reform bill.  However, the Senate is not likely to vote in favor of the repeal.


Click here to read more from the New York Times.


Tax Free Individual Health Insurance in Alaska Using HRAs, POPs and Payroll Reimbursement Arrangements

 
alaska hraNote: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

HRAs, POPs and tax free individual health insurance are 100% allowed in Alaska if administered the correct way.

Nothing in Alaska insurance code restricts an employer (small or large) from offering HRAs and POPs that reimburse individual health insurance plans. HRAs and POPs are federal plans that are not regulated by the Alaska Department of Insurance.

However, there exists confusion with regard to the state insurance code that regulates insurance companies insuring small employers (i.e. companies with 2-50 employees). It is important to realize that the insurance code applies to insurance companies and does not restrict a small employer from offering employees the ability to reimburse themselves for individual health insurance costs tax free.




Sec. 21.54.500. Definition

(14) ..."group market" includes a health benefit plan for a small employer in the group market that includes an arrangement under which
    (A) a portion of the premium or benefits is paid by a small employer;

    (B) a covered individual or dependent is reimbursed, through wage adjustments or otherwise, by or on behalf of a small employer for all or a portion of the premium; or
    (C) the health benefit plan is treated by the employer or any of the eligible employees or dependents as part of a plan or program for the purposes of 26 U.S.C. 106 or 26 U.S.C. 162 (Internal Revenue Code);



Individual policies reimbursed by ZanePOP cannot be made subject to the requirements of Section 627.6699 because, with ZanePOP:

    1. The employer does not pay a portion of the premium or benefits for the individual health insurance policy.
    2. The employer does not reimburse the employee for any portion of the premium. 
The non-applicability of 627.6699 to individual policies reimbursed by ZanePOP should be straightforward. Please post questions in the comment section.

Similarly, individual policies reimbursed by ZaneHRA cannot be made subject to the requirements of Section 627.6699 because, with ZaneHRA:
    1. The employer does not pay a portion of the premium or benefits for the individual health insurance policy;
    2. The employer does not limit reimbursement to specific individual health insurance premiums and never knowingly or directly reimburses individual health insurance premiums;
The ZaneHRA itself is the "Plan", not the health care items reimbursed by the "Plan". In other words, ZaneHRAs are qualified ERISA- and HIPAA-compliant employee welfare benefit plans. However the medical items (e.g. pharmacy, insurance policy costs, doctor visits, etc.) for which each employee chooses to seek reimbursement from their ZaneHRA, are not part of an employee welfare benefit plan.
    The federal government has guidelines for employers who want to allow insurers or their representatives access to their employees without triggering ERISA plan status and the associated liabilities. ZaneHRA is designed to comply with these guidelines.

    Compliance includes the following restrictions on the actions of employers:

      1. Employers must not be involved in employees' decision to purchase individual health insurance, or their decision on which insurer or plan to use. They must not get involved in any negotiations with an insurance carrier over price or benefits of individual health insurance plans, and must not provide employees with claim forms or other materials related to their individual health insurance policies.
      2. Employers may not directly pay premiums on individual health insurance policies. They must not receive any compensation from an insurance carrier in connection with an employee's individual health insurance policy. 
      3. Employers must not become involved in any claim dispute between an employee and an insurance carrier; all inquiries must be directed to the insurer.
    To comply with point (1) above, while still making contributions to an HRA that can reimburse for individual health insurance premiums, employers must follow these additional guidelines:

      1. Employers must not pressure employees to use the money in their HRA to pay for individual insurance coverage. Employers may require HRA participants to have health insurance coverage to participate in their HRA provided this requirement is waived for participants medically unqualified to obtain health insurance (e.g. rejected, uprated, excluded).
      2. In addition to reimbursing for health insurance premiums, employers should also allow the use of HRA funds for qualified medical expenses.
      3. Employers must limit their role to simply reimbursing qualified medical expenses as directed by the ZaneHRA plan.

    Clarifying Health Noted as Top 50 Health Care Blog

     
    0d99fc8b-5597-4cdf-b42c-afd39e8b6862
    Note: This should not be taken as tax or legal advice

    Checkout the MBA in Healthcare Administration Blog's recent post, "50 Best Healthcare Blogs You Aren't Reading Yet".  Clarifying Health is listed at #11.

    Thank you for reading!

    All Posts
    More Info
    Product
    Customers
    Across the Web
    Contact Us
    Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is general in nature and does not apply to any specific U.S. state except where noted. Health insurance regulations differ in each state. See a licensed agent for detailed information on your state. Zane Benefits, Inc. does not sell health insurance.